Cloud programmes rarely fail on technology. They fail on sequencing, on dependencies nobody mapped, and on an architecture that was correct in isolation but wrong for the organisation running it. This work covers the design and the migration path together, so the target state and the route to it are decided at the same time.

Scope

What this covers

Landing zone and platform design

Subscription and management group structure, naming and tagging, networking, policy and governance — set up once, deliberately, rather than retrofitted.

Migration planning and execution

Workload discovery and dependency mapping, migration approach per workload, wave sequencing, cutover and rollback planning.

Hybrid connectivity

Site-to-site and ExpressRoute connectivity, DNS, and the identity plumbing that makes hybrid workloads behave predictably.

Cost and operating model

Right-sizing, reservation and commitment strategy, and the tagging discipline that makes cloud spend attributable afterwards.

When this comes up

Typical starting points

  • A cloud migration has stalled, or the plan has not survived contact with the business
  • Azure spend is rising and nobody can attribute it to a workload
  • The estate grew subscription by subscription with no governing structure
  • A datacentre lease or hardware refresh is forcing a decision

Not sure where your risk actually sits?

Start with a scoped assessment of your Microsoft 365 and Azure environment.

Book a conversation